Do statutory caps on damages affect medical negligence claims?

healyscanlonveugelergannon • November 5, 2014

In Illinois and throughout the rest of the United States, there has been a sharp increase in medical malpractice premiums over the past decade; as a result, medical malpractice insurance has regained interest.  Illinois personal injury  experts have observed that this phenomenon may be due to the adoption of statutory caps by states, which limit the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a medical malpractice lawsuit. The question that arises is, what is considered fair compensation for a victim of medical negligence? The other question that comes up is, what is the government’s position in the event that the death occurs due to medical negligence and how does that relate to statutory caps?

The controversy regarding statutory caps for damages may not be unjustified. There is a frequent disagreement as to whether statutory caps actually help reduce malpractice premiums, how medical errors might be affected by them and whether they allow fair compensation for injured patients. Another question is whether the caps actually reduce the expenses on medical liability insurance, increase access to health care and lower health insurance expenses.

There are many types of caps on damages; some caps apply to medical malpractice claims and others apply to personal injury cases, including malpractice cases. Some of those caps apply to compensatory damages that are non-economic in nature and others to economic damages, as well as noneconomic compensatory damages. Sometimes, punitive damages are also included in the caps.

During a trial, the jury typically is not notified about the damage caps and their effects. Courts have widely agreed that most of these statutes are unconstitutional. However, the question of whether injured patients are being fairly compensated for their losses or suffering due to medical negligence remains unanswered.

Source:  The Milbank Quarterly, “ Damages Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases ,” Leonard J. Nelson, III, Michael A. Morrisey and Meredith L. Kilgore, accessed Oct. 30, 2014

Millions Secured for Injured Worker

December 11, 2024
Kevin Veugeler secured a $3.2 million recovery plus a waiver of $750,000 in Workers' Compensation benefits for a Sprinkler Fitter who fell from a ladder. While litigating this case, Kevin was able to show that the general contractor and owner of the jobsite failed to follow their own site-specific safety plan to protect the safety of their subcontractors. Through documents and deposition testimony, Kevin was able to establish that the general contractor and owner failed to provide a safe place to work. If you, a friend or a family member have been injured, please contact Healy Scanlon Veugeler Gannon for a free consultation.

$8.55 Million Recovered for Injured Construction Worker

December 11, 2024
Matthew Gannon secured an $8.55 million dollar settlement for a construction laborer who suffered a crush injury involving multiple fractures of his leg. Matthew obtained evidence that the general contractor in charge of the work site failed to appropriately stage the phases of work during construction. In addition, Matthew uncovered evidence that the equipment that caused the injury was not being properly supervised at the time of the occurrence. If you, a friend or a family member have been injured, please contact Healy Scanlon Veugeler Gannon for a free consultation.