O’BRIEN v. YAMAHA
A New Lenox man who was paralyzed from the waist down after losing control of his motorcycle while jumping dirt mounds six years ago was awarded $24 million Monday by a Cook County Circuit Court jury.
Anthony O’Brien, 28, alleged during the trial that the carburetor on his 1996 YZ125 Yamaha stuck open as he approached his jump, causing the motorcycle to accelerate, said his attorney, Martin Healy.
O’Brien, who already had made about 10 jumps that day on his friend’s farm outside Manhattan in Will County, landed on his buttocks, fracturing his spine, Healy said.
“We believe that he certainly was capable of doing what he was doing that day,” Healy said. “Yamaha says he gave too much throttle as he was going up the ramp.”
The jury delivered its verdict against Yamaha Motor Corp. U.S.A. and its parent company, Yamaha Motor Co. of Japan. The jury deliberated about five hours Monday after the monthlong trial, Healy said. An attorney for Yamaha declined to comment on the verdict Monday and would not say whether the company would appeal.
O’Brien had owned a smaller motorcycle and rode regularly as a boy and into his early teens. He later rode all-terrain vehicles and other friends’ motorcycles until he bought the Yamaha two weeks before the accident.
Attorneys for Yamaha attacked his riding experience, but Healy said O’Brien had maintained his skill level.
A week before the accident, O’Brien noticed that the motorcycle would hesitate for a few seconds in returning to idle after he released the throttle, Healy said. The hesitation did not occur consistently, and O’Brien and his friends who examined the motorcycle could not determine the cause of the problem.
During the trial, Healy said he presented evidence that showed the chrome plating on the carburetor slide had started to peel, causing the slide to stick open and inject fuel into the engine after the throttle was released.
Yamaha attorneys argued that peeling chrome would not impair the function of the motorcycle, Healy said. However, Healy said he introduced evidence that showed such peeling was a violation of Japanese industrial standards.
On the day of the accident, O’Brien and three friends were jumping a pair of dirt mounds 3 to 4 feet high and about 12 feet apart. When O’Brien crashed, he launched off one mound and landed a few feet past the second one, Healy said.
DONNELLAN v. FIRST STUDENT BUS CO.
Mild Brain Injury
On February 11, 2002, plaintiff Vincent Donnellan’s cargo van was rear-ended by a school bus driven by an employee of defendant First Student, Inc. Plaintiff, 31 years old on the date of the accident, had no adverse health issues at the time. Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that, as a result of the accident, he suffered numerous permanent physical and mental injuries. Defendant conceded its negligence in the accident, but disputed that the accident was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s alleged injuries.
On April 7, 2006, following several days of trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $6 million. Defendant seeks reversal of the jury verdict or, alternatively, reversal of the damages award and remand for new trial on damages or substantial remittitur. Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion and committed prejudicial error in allowing plaintiff’s day-in-the-life video as demonstrative evidence but barred defendant’s surveillance video. Defendant also argues that it was prejudiced by several evidentiary errors and the trial court’s instructions to the jury. For the following reasons, we affirm the verdict of the jury.
KELLY v. DART TRANSIT
Truck, Bus Highway Crash
Automobile accident involving two cars, a bus and a semi-trailer and tractor. Plaintiff’s husband’s car was hit by another car which cross the median and went airborne. Mr. Kelly’s car then crossed into another lane and was hit by a bus which was, in turn, rear-ended by Dart’s tractor-trailer. The bus’ fuel tank ruptured and Kelly’s car burned. Kelly was an ironworker who earned $50,000. He was survived by his wife and two adult children.
SKELTON v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Loss of an Arm
Mass Transit Light Rail “El” Train
Plaintiff, Joseph Skelton, brought an action seeking recovery for personal injuries sustained when he fell from a station platform and was struck by an oncoming train owned and operated by defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (CTA). Following trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $7,824,655, but reduced the award of damages by 70% to $2,347,396 based upon plaintiff’s contributory negligence.
Per Governor Pritzker’s recent request that workplaces reduce their workforce and work remote whenever possible, please be advised that our office remains open, but many employees will be working remotely until the end of the month. Mail, voicemail, and emails will be received. We thank you for your patience during this period of time.